| Topic | Claude Cowork | AionUi |
|---|---|---|
| Operating systems | macOS only | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Models | Claude-focused | Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, Qwen, Ollama, LM Studio, … |
| CLI agents | Claude Code oriented | Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Qwen Code, OpenCode, Goose, Auggie |
| Remote use | Limited / product-specific | WebUI + Telegram |
| Data | Vendor cloud assumptions | Local SQLite for app history |
| License / cost | Paid subscription | Free open source (Apache-2.0) |
Claude Cowork vs AionUi
Side-by-side look at two “cowork” style AI experiences—and why many teams choose AionUi for broader platform and model support.
When AionUi is the better fit
- You need Windows or Linux.
- You want multiple models or local models via Ollama / LM Studio.
- You want file + office workflows (see use cases).
When Claude Cowork still wins
Anthropic’s own UI will always track Claude-specific features first. If your org standardized on macOS, funds the subscription without debate, and only needs Claude Code-shaped workflows, staying in-ecosystem can mean fewer moving parts.
Migration checklist
- Install AionUi from Download and confirm Claude Code detection.
- Copy over API keys or login flows you already use for Claude; verify in LLM configuration.
- Recreate critical chat contexts manually—there is no automatic import from another vendor’s cloud history.
- Enable WebUI only after you understand network exposure; see remote access.